I’ll take Taxes for two hundred, Bob

Arnold_Troutstamp Politicians love to make distinctions that don’t exist in dictionaries. It’s part of the benefits of such a lofty post, caretaker of the public trust.

Miriam Webster doesn’t see it that way.

Main Entry:
user fee
Function:
noun
Date:
1967

: an excise tax often in the form of a license or supplemental charge levied to fund a public service —called also user’s fee

Main Entry:
tax
Function:
noun
Usage:
often attributive
Date:
14th century

1 a: a charge usually of money imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes b: a sum levied on members of an organization to defray expenses2: a heavy demand

During times of economic hardship fees can never be taxes, as increasing taxes play havoc with economic recovery, and increasing fees just means those that used to enjoy something – pay more for enjoying it.

With the collapse of the financial system states and business’s are struggling to find new sources of revenue to bolster massive shortfalls in traditional taxes. Bond markets remain in upheaval, and many states are prevented from using the traditional tools to secure operating revenue.

That’s where you come in.

Your house isn’t worth pizzle, your investments have been cut in half, you’re squirreling money away rather than spend it, in short – you’re not holding up your end of the economy.

You’re not patriotic.

We can expect most of the 50 state legislatures to start getting creative with the fee versus tax distinction, and those groups with little representation (anglers) will pay much more for “normal” stuff.

New York state is soliciting opinion on their new 2009 Salmon – Trout stamp, ten bucks on top of the normal license fee. Salmon anglers are likely a minority – toss “trout” on the label and you’ve got everybody having to pony up.

We’re not suggesting that wardens and natural resources aren’t deserved of protection, nor are we suggesting that state’s raise and plant trout for free.  We’re suggesting these dollars will be siphoned off into the General Fund, and spent on something wildly different than their original intent.

3 thoughts on “I’ll take Taxes for two hundred, Bob

  1. Jean-Paul Lipton

    Welcome to Minnesota, the land of 10,00 taxes and user fees. We’ve been dealing with this for a lot longer than most of you guys.

    What gets interesting is how we recover from crisis after everything is already taxed and assessed fees. Do we get double taxed or do the fees increase? The governor’s solution is to cut funding to many programs so that you don’t have to worry about fees anymore, because they no longer exist.

    Nice huh?

  2. Scott V

    Our fee’s get increased and at the same time they are cutting way back on planting. So now that they are saving alot of money by not planting and getting more revenues in increased license fee’s, will we see the fruits of our labors “fees”.

    And personally Keith I think you were just happy to be able to post your Arnold picture.

Comments are closed.