Reed Curry at Overmywaders.com is writing a multipart series on trout vision and how the ultraviolet spectrum may affect the appearance of both real and artificial mayflies.
I’m a self confessed science buff – but still consider this a must read for any fly tier that labors over an exacting imitation:
The materials we commonly use in our mayfly imitations – furs and feathers – do not provide a UV key, the all-important “trigger”, which tells the wary trout that the fly drifting above him is real. Given the choice of taking a fly which has no UVA signature (our artificial) or the natural insect that glows in a certain banding, the trout’s instinct is to sip the natural drifting inches away rather than our artfully created, but unmarked, imitation.
Parts 1 & 2 are available already, and like all of Reed’s efforts, hold great promise for what’s coming. I’m a huge fan of his prose, and unlike myself – he thinks before committing pen to paper.
I figure if we all pile on, he’ll write faster…
KB,
I’m writing as fast as I can (puff, puff…) but for every line I write I need to take a dozen photos and process them through three different software programs. Then there is the significant vole and kestrel issue.
It is very interesting to me, I hope I can convey the enjoyment along with the science.
Think of all them fellows at a dead standstill in their winter tying. I read the first two installments and froze … now I’m waiting for the shoe to drop, ala “Picric Acid” has the UV signature of a charging Water Buffalo in full mating plumage, trout cannot resist…
Don’t make me hurt you..