Fly fishermen have no business arguing the merits of food

Shat from the pipe with a flatulent sound I’m going to be the unpopular voice suggesting we’re discussing symptoms rather than problems. I’ll be the idiot insisting we’re in a place we shouldn’t be, that we’re arguing elitist snobbery when all the fellow in the white lab coat wants to do is feed the world cheaply.

They’ll tell you it’s all about Frankensalmon, but it’s not.

Frankensalmon exists because we ate all the brood stock, paved over the wild fish’s spawning riffle, pulled the gravel out of the streambed to make concrete skyscrapers and to vanish Jimmy Hoffa.

Where was all that righteous indignation when you kept fish you gave the neighbor, or fed your family, or when you flushed that anti-freeze into the sewer under cover of darkness, or when you passed that old lady in the slow lane with a curse and a throaty bellow from those shiny twin exhaust pipes…

That’s when you should have thought of the purity part, the Mother Nature thing, or the Big Picture even …

But you didn’t really … you handed twenty bucks to some other guy hoping he’d conserve the fish on your behalf. You hoped that your twenty matched with a couple hundred thousand others made a difference, something larger, and well intentioned. Naturally it freed you of any obligation to conserve, and the only limit to your fervor the number of vacation days you could beg from an employer.

A couple of decades later you discovered all those twenties had really accomplished very little, as the opposition had so many more of them – and the ear of the legislature to boot.

… and it sure didn’t slow you down any. Just the mention that some of those fish were running had you out crunching gravel, hoping you’d get extra lucky, perhaps you’d even get to keep one.

And while the scientists announced there were no new fish stocks entering the supply chain, and that the world’s oceans were at their zenith of production, with less fish to fight over for the coming decades – you assumed all those warnings applied to the other guy, never you.

Australia announced it was protecting its Bluefin Tuna population from the rest of the world, because the other developed countries couldn’t agree to reduce their catch. The French confessed the existing quotas meant spit, as they were intent on killing any tuna in the Mediterranean; each was worth $40,000 – and even more next year due to their being extincted so quickly.

Ninety-eight percent of the tuna in the Mediterranean has been killed already, and with the fish increasing in value, all those boats will be chasing them North or East, to whichever part of the planet that can support more.

Perhaps you’re aware of the incessant plunder, maybe you even sent another twenty to some fellow who yells into a megaphone at the fellow shotgunning tuna. Freed of that obligation and knowing you’d done the fish a solid, you probably took the spouse out for sushi.

You and your family ate as much as you liked whenever you liked, so did your dad and his family, and while you assumed fish would never run out, it always seemed to be a bit worse than the last trip, until the degree of change was undeniable.

With the Israeli’s shooting up Palestinian fishing boats, the North Koreans impounded a Chinese fishing fleet and some South Korean fishermen, the Somali’s turn to piracy just because they couldn’t compete with those shiny trawlers that vacuumed their coastline, and China seizing Vietnamese fishermen in disputed waters, fish stocks and the old resentments are starting to warm things up a bit.

… or in case you hadn’t noticed, the population of the world continues to grow unchecked, and while we’ve enjoyed a couple hundred years of rich living, demonstrated by our expanding waistlines and type II diabetes, the underdeveloped countries will be wanting their share of Nintendo, Playboy, and salmon fillets shortly.

… and with all the debt we’ve amassed getting here, our government won’t object much. Even if we’ve finally developed the fiscal sensibilities to slowly extricate ourselves from the entire mortgage-induced fiasco, we’ll still need a decade or so of offshore largesse to make a significant dent in the principal owed.

We’d prefer a solution that doesn’t involve lowering the world’s population quickly via emptying most of the silos in South Dakota at the whim of an Alaska governor who thinks the result “winnable.” To that end a couple thousand lab coated wunderkind labor to feed the world, knowing their governments can’t or won’t cooperate, using technology that some avaricious company will try to patent, and will hopefully grow scads of nutritious protein using the RNA of kitty litter mixed with the DNA of some aquatic cockroach.

… some warm water cockroach, so the result isn’t immediately obsolesced by climate change…

 … and us fly fishermen puff up our chest and exclaim, How goddamn dare they

On a world wide scale we’ve probably killed eighty percent of the historic salmon runs, and modified the remaining twenty percent into a mongrelized mixture of hatchery interbred with whatever we added from a bucket in 1880, plus whatever we found there all natural like …

… so we’re down to a half dozen widows and orphans and we’ve yet to show any remorse whatsoever. None of us are prepared to give up the cabin in the pines, the V-6’s or V-12’s that delivered us there, or stem the flow of ibuprofen and estrogen that weeps from our leach field and into the fishery.

… and to a man we’re hoping someone else will lower their carbon footprint so we can consume their share secretly.

It’s not about Frankenfish, it’s about feeding the entire bloody planet.

Now Trout Unlimited is going to take its miniscule little budget which was given to them to rebuild fish stocks and recover despoiled streams, and instead will spend all those dollar bills litigating the FDA into groping “Lumpy Frank’s” privates a second time – just to ensure all that fish-like equipment is still where it’s supposed to be.

… and if it’s considered to be an entirely different species it won’t matter at all. We’ll kill and eat the last of the Salmon, then see if we can entice the Lumpster to eat flies – hoping those algae pellets put a bit of life into his flaccid arse …

I’d guess that Trout Unlimited, like many well meaning conservation organizations, is tired of reclaiming creeks only to watch the press of our feet return them to semi-spoiled within the decade. The problem has and always will be people –  not salmon genes – or what a pure salmon should look like …

There’s too many of us, and the irritating thing is we’re growing unabated on both borrowed money and time.

If you’re indignant that we’d cross a Salmon with a licorice stick – yielding something as unsightly as a lumpy salmonid, wait until later when we dispose of all the non essentials like eyes, fins, and lips, and just grow a large amorphous ball of protein, which is carved each morning into irregular shaped filets to give the illusion it once lived in water.

Think how aghast we’ll be if we realized the Omega-3 “slab” on our plate was never sentient, instead making a great flatulent sound as it leaped out of the nozzle and into the brightly colored styrofoam tray below.

Rather you should practice your lust for litigation by peeling the bun back on a Fillet O’ Fish, which is another well documented mongrel, whose pedigree is almost entirely suspect.

12 thoughts on “Fly fishermen have no business arguing the merits of food

  1. Craig

    One of the few prescient views of the “problem.” We argue about felt vs studded, aquaculture vs wild, slot limits, and on and on – – ad nauseum, in the true meaning of that phrase. Meanwhile, the real problem stares us in the eyeballs, too close to even focus on: small world, too many (greedy) people. I blame it all on the TV show “Dallas.”

  2. Logan

    Wow. That took some courage to put out there. Thank you. Glad I didn’t write it (mainly because no one would’ve read it).

    For every increase in food production, there is an equivalent increase in population, always in the “emerging countries” (what a disturbing euphemism). There are lots of answers to our “growing” problem, none of which are too pretty. Nothing will change until all our choices dwindle to nothing. Pretty cool, huh?

  3. Peter

    Truth. Too many people, not enough planet.

    Solution is easy but messy.

    And illegal in most countries.

    So, where do we go? Nowhere, I’m afraid.

    Politicians never find answers, just better questions. That’s their business, alas.

  4. Cyberfish

    Curious…How are flyfishers to blame for the shortage of salmon or tuna???

    Flyfishers did not eat all the brood stock, did not pave over the riffles, did not pull all the gravel from the stream beds and did not bury Jimmy Hoffa. And the shortage of tuna in the Mediterranean Sea is also due to flyfishing?

    Read the article sgain folks…Where’s the proof flyfishers are at fault.

  5. kbarton10

    The point of the article is that humans and the press of humanity is forever changing the outdoors experience – and not in a good way.

    Us anglers have no right to be angry at Frankenfish and the lengths that science must endure to feed the planet, despite our knowledge of the decline and fall of the environment, we show no signs of mitigating our behavior – and consider it a right to kill and eat our fair share.

  6. Owl Jones

    Well, that made for some good reading…it was itself a bit pompous and had far too many assumptions for my taste, but it was entertaining at the very least.
    If you think there are too many of us, there’s a quite obvious way to help. Just saying…

    See, you’re not the only one who can say the unpopular. 😉

Comments are closed.