How’s your entomology? The 50 million year old mayfly likely needs to be keyed to genus and species.
..or you can take the shortcut, and hope no one notices you might have bent the rules a bit..
An Islamic text entitled “The Atlas of Creation” has created quite a stir, it purports to show Darwinism doesn’t exist – assisted by fossil evidence in amber to prove the point.
The only problem is that little nameless caddis fly, not the one preserved in amber, it’s the “live” one next to it … the one that hasn’t changed in all them millions of years.
I’d say there were red faces aplenty – especially with that big old hook there for the scientific community to pounce on.
Come to think of it, that hook does look old…
Technorati Tags: Atlas of Creation, darwinism, Harun Yahya, Oopsie
I saw that book on the net.I found that it’s quite attractive.I am impressed by the evidences of fossils.The fossils really leave no other words to say:?t’s obvious that the living creatures are created and no imaginary evoltion process has ever took place.
Atlas of Creation is a wonderful book. ?t is Harun Yahya’s book. Harun Yahya is a Muslim writer from Turkey. He has lots of books about evolution theory. he collapsed evolution theory and we saw that evolution is just a fake.
Atlas of Creation emphasizes one very important issue: The lack of transitional form fossils.The Darwinists can never explain the absence of transitional forms. Even Darwin himself told that his theory would collapse if no transitional forms can ever be found.So %99 of the paleantological researches are completed today..We had to find billions and trillions of these transitional forms proving the “imaginary”evolution process. Are there any? Not even a single one!This is enough to destroy all the darwinist claims.As a French researcher, I congartulate Harun Yahya, for having explained this subject in such a simple and effective and scientific way.
…explained all but the fish hook I’m afraid, and ignoring the transitory phases found in the earlier post:
http://singlebarbed.com/2008/01/21/think-of-that-next-time-you-toss-the-sumbitch-up-onto-the-bank/
I’m not the only one casting the stones here, there’s a couple million of folks questioning the author and his research.
have you ever seen a fossil of fish half starfish?Or half birth half cow ? The images we see on the newspapers are proved to be reconstructions.There are lots of exemples:piltdown, nebraska etc…No one could ever prove the so called “transition process” of the imaginary evolution 🙂 Atlas of creation gives the best answer buy showing the creatures with their present forms and their forms of millions of years ago.No difference!If there was smthng like evolution not the two pictures you present above, there should have been millions of other pictures of half fly half other animal (no matter what).But we have two pictures of differnet times:fly, fly,fly always fly!!!
“Evolution is just a fake.” Whew, I’m glad that controversy is settled. At least now all the scientists of the world can go home and take up, what else, fly-fishing.
I was lucky enough just a few days ago to have my hands on some of the most rare amber in the world, here in Baja Sur. http://www.amberart.net/amber.htm
and wrote about it in:http://www.amberart.net/amber.htm
Thank God Singlebarbed has shown us the light.
To Kbarton10:
There are lots of findings that are supporting the author and his research:
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&makale_id=1506,
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&makale_id=1479,
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&makale_id=1251
and so on…
rgrds,
I saw the book on net too. I think it is THE END OF DARWINISM.
There is no doubt that Evolutionary Theory retrieved against “Atlas of Creation”. In the book there are hundreds of evidences that shows that all the living things are the same as they first occured on earth then they are created. While Evolutionary Theory couldnt be able to introduce any-even one- transitional form fossil, there are thousands of fossils that are the same with living creatures. That is so clear that everything is created. Evolutionary Theory is the lie of this century
A difficult point to be sure, but evolution does not necessarily mean the subject changes it’s form completely – it may only have longer “feelers” or a leg joint is shaped differently.
It’s a slow process that makes subtle adaptive change. Examination of the subjects preserved in amber may find that a leg or abdomen has had a subtle change, but only a microscope will discern the difference – not the human eye.
I celebrate your right to believe otherwise – but you have failed to prove your case…. as have I, with my primitive public school science background.
I have read some of Harun Yahya books. I think he is an intelligent, sincere author. His deas are so clear, logical and smart. In his web sites I have read this: 22 April 2000 issue of New Scientist, Mr. Oktar became an international hero, in communicating the fallacy of the theory of evolution and the fact of creation. The author’s intellectual struggle against materialism and Darwinism has frequently been mentioned in such mainly evolutionist publications as National Geographic, Science, New Scientist and NSCE Reports. The English and German editions of the November, 2004, issue of National Geographic referred to the author’s works concerning the Fact of Creation. The following quotation from the book The Evolution Deceit was also included: The theory of evolution is nothing but a deception imposed on us by the dominators of the world system.
Way to go, Singlebarbed. Now you’ve done it.
First, from a scientific perspective, the book is a joke; he intentionally misinterprets Darwin’s theory, and once his strawman has been set, he proceeds to knock it down… but not really.
It’s terrible when you can’t even convincingly knock down your own strawman.
Somebody invested way more time debunking this book than I ever would: you can find his YouTube series here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HXTKw2-mEs
Move along, nothing to see…
I know this book from tv. This book banned in France because of collapsed of evolution. However i found it on net, its free on harunyahya.com, and a wonderful book, and advise to all human. Thanks to the author.
Singlebarbed: I guess you’re trying to recapture the adrenaline rush of being shot at, and I suppose catching the attention of the Islamic Creationists is one way to go about that. Must be one helluva monkey on your back. My only question is where do you go from here?
Side note: TCWriter is spot on.
This is my version of “Gonzo” journalism – perhaps a touch more adrenalin than I bargained for…
That bug is not even an accurate fake of a fungus gnat. I have been doing a grow out of Lobelia siphilitica for my research, and I have killed thousands of fungus gnats. They resemble midges or Drosophila.
/end science nerd
Wow,
Didnt read all of the comments above. These people are actually scarier than Christian scientists.
Good luck with this thing youre doing here.
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.
That about sums it up…
Back in the day many people believed the world was flat. And for some time there really was no proof that it wasn’t. But that did not make it any less round.
I am today from Turkey where read it book. Make you argument to bad belief is evolution. No subject, predicate necessary in complete sentence. Believe it to me when I tell it to you this! Book say all fly have hook – the great one make it so, but amber dissolve hook – so fly the same! Evolution is crock of lalala. Yah-lah!
Wow, here we are, more than 200 years after the Enlightenment, when logic, reason and scientific inquiry began to lift mankind out of the wallow and murk of superstition and we still have people walking the earth who believe a neolithic mythology is the answer to all questions.
Do you realize the irony in making your anti-science statements on the internet, through a computer? Or do you believe that god created the internet?
Salty, you own.
Check under your car with a mirror before leaving work, just to be safe.
I will vary my routes and switch vehicles often.
Is crock of lalala, I tell it to you this, the evolution. Is jew who believe neolithic mythology, but even jew know Al Gore invent internet! Say uh ooo-mow-mow, Obama-lama ding dong! Yes, yes, amber melt hook. God is great!
Hi everyone, on paleantological base, every new fossil discovered only supports the fact that there is NO any change observed in the structures and designs of the creatures.Once a year, we only read in the newspapers that a transitional form was found.. That’s all. Ok, if there had been transitional forms found, then there should have been a museum immediately opened and all of them should have been exhibited, right? THEN WHERE ARE THEY, of course IF THERE IS ANY?? Sorry guys, evolution “theory” was born death just like Darwin who wrote in his book; Origin of Species; “if there will not be any fossil records found supporting my “theory”, the theory will be collapsed…” It is collapsed with hightlight effect..
Inci, please explain DNA, which conclusively shows the genetic connectivity between every living creature on the planet- birds are closely related to dinosaurs and humans and chimpanzees share 98% of their DNA.
Try to explain that, without resorting to an ignorant “god did it” answer.
Just to back up my point
13. Evolutionists cannot point to any transitional fossils–creatures that are half reptile and half bird, for instance.
Actually, paleontologists know of many detailed examples of fossils intermediate in form between various taxonomic groups. One of the most famous fossils of all time is Archaeopteryx, which combines feathers and skeletal structures peculiar to birds with features of dinosaurs. A flock’s worth of other feathered fossil species, some more avian and some less, has also been found. A sequence of fossils spans the evolution of modern horses from the tiny Eohippus. Whales had four-legged ancestors that walked on land, and creatures known as Ambulocetus and Rodhocetus helped to make that transition [see “The Mammals That Conquered the Seas,” by Kate Wong; Scientific American, May]. Fossil seashells trace the evolution of various mollusks through millions of years. Perhaps 20 or more hominids (not all of them our ancestors) fill the gap between Lucy the australopithecine and modern humans.
Creationists, though, dismiss these fossil studies. They argue that Archaeopteryx is not a missing link between reptiles and birds–it is just an extinct bird with reptilian features. They want evolutionists to produce a weird, chimeric monster that cannot be classified as belonging to any known group. Even if a creationist does accept a fossil as transitional between two species, he or she may then insist on seeing other fossils intermediate between it and the first two. These frustrating requests can proceed ad infinitum and place an unreasonable burden on the always incomplete fossil record. 13. Evolutionists cannot point to any transitional fossils–creatures that are half reptile and half bird, for instance.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF
Salty,
The way the brass is piling up you must need a couple more boxes of .50 CAL, I’ll go fetch ’em.
thanks, I could use some admin editing though. I double pasted the “transitional fossil” refutation by accident.
Can you get some some belted 40mm for the MK19? I’m getting really low on that
I’m scared to edit your work, TC will come out of the woodwork and call me Creationist if I do.
Wow, this still going on…
I can’t believe no one has lobbed this one in yet:
ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny
That ought’a get’em going again.